Recipes for checklists and bundles: one part active ingredient, two parts measurement.
نویسندگان
چکیده
To cite: Chopra V, Shojania KG. BMJ Qual Saf 2013;22:93–96. Central venous catheter-related bloodstream infection (CVC-BSI) is common, costly and potentially fatal. For decades, conventional wisdom regarded these infections as inevitable complications of care. This view changed following landmark studies 3 that demonstrated substantial reductions associated with the CVC-BSI ‘bundle.’ 5 Investigators at Johns Hopkins University designed an improvement model that featured (1) a checklist, or bundle, of evidence-based practices (proper hand hygiene, chlorhexidine for skin antisepsis, use of maximal sterile barriers, avoidance of the femoral site); (2) education regarding these infectioncontrol practices; (3) a catheter-insertion cart; (4) daily review and prompt removal of unwarranted CVCs and (5) empowerment of nurses to enforce adherence to these practices. An initial evaluation of this bundled intervention revealed an impressive decrease in CVC-BSIs from 11.3 infections/1000 catheter days to 0/1000 catheter days at Johns Hopkins. Seeking external validation, investigators partnered with the Michigan Keystone Health and Hospital Association to evaluate the CVC-BSI bundle in 103 intensive care units (ICUs) across 77 hospitals. This study again showed a large and statistically significant reduction in CVC-BSIs, from a baseline mean of 7.7 infections/1000 catheter days to 1.4/1000 catheter days. The CVC-BSI bundle had arrived. The success of the CVC-BSI bundle stimulated interest in checklists for surgical safety. WHO’s Surgical Safety Checklist led to substantial improvements in operative outcomes in diverse clinical settings. A study of multiple checklists at different stages in the perioperative period showed impressive improvements in surgical complications and mortality at six hospitals in The Netherlands. These dramatic results—in ICUs and operating rooms— made checklists virtually synonymous with safer innovative care.
منابع مشابه
TAAABLE 3: Adaptation of ingredient quantities and of textual preparations
TAAABLE 3 is a textual case-based cooking system which is a contestant in the third computer cooking contest, inheriting most features of its previous versions (TAAABLE and WIKITAAABLE) and adding new features. The reused features are information retrieval and text mining for building a domain ontology and for annotating the ingredient part of the recipes, a semantic wiki in which the whole kno...
متن کاملSubs and Sandwiches: Replacing One Ingredient By Another
The Earl system works in the domain of sandwich recipes. We show how Earl uses two sources of knowledge —ingredients knowledge that is extracted from a gastronomy web site, and a case base of sandwich recipes— to propose substitutes for ingredients in sandwich recipes. In particular, we describe four substitution methods: humanauthored substitutions, taxonomically-driven substitutions, lexicall...
متن کاملA Comparative Analysis of Lexical Bundles in Journalistic Writing in English and Persian: A Contrastive Linguistic Perspective
This paper investigates the use of ‘lexical bundles’ in two broad corpora of journalistic writing. The aim of this study is to compare the use of lexical bundles in the two domains, one consisted of newspaper articles written in English and published in England and the other one comprised of newspaper articles written in Persian from Iranian publications. For this purpose, the frequency...
متن کاملNative and Non-native Use of Lexical Bundles in Discussion Section of Political Science Articles
The study of lexical bundles, among types of text analysis, is gaining importance over the others in the last century. The present study employed a frequency-based analysis approach to the use of lexical bundles. The discussion section of 60 political science articles, with corpora around 253,063 words were investigated in three aspects of structure, form, and function of lexical bundles. The p...
متن کاملA Comparative Analysis of Lexical Bundles in Journalistic Writing in English and Persian: A Contrastive Linguistic Perspective
This paper investigates the use of ‘lexical bundles’ in two broad corpora of journalistic writing. The aim of this study is to compare the use of lexical bundles in the two domains, one consisted of newspaper articles written in English and published in England and the other one comprised of newspaper articles written in Persian from Iranian publications. For this purpose, the frequency...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- BMJ quality & safety
دوره 22 2 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2013